Latest

Great Yarmouth Magistrates' Court Sentencing Results

Explore 7 verdicts at Great Yarmouth Magistrates' Court (Great Yarmouth). Updated with the latest court outcomes.

Great Yarmouth Magistrates' Court
June 2026 1 case
Gary Lanchester
12 Jun 2026
Sending communications threatening death or serious harm *
Sentence
12 months imprisonment suspended for 12 months

Gary Lanchester, 38, of Herries Close, Great Yarmouth, sent 1,246 threatening and abusive emails to NHS staff between January and May 2025, after being released from prison for similar offences. The emails, sometimes as frequent as every two minutes, demanded medication and immediate GP contact. When demands were not met, he threatened to stab workers, throw acid, and harm staff, and stated he would take his own life. Between March and May 2026 he continued sending abusive emails despite warnings. He was charged with two counts of sending communications threatening death or serious harm for messages sent on 29–31 May 2025, and admitted those and additional offences.

Pleaded guilty to two counts of sending communications threatening death or serious harm. Also admitted further offences of sending abusive and insulting emails and distributing grossly offensive messages. Restraining order for two years, 12-month mental health treatment, 15-day rehabilitation activity requirement, and £187 victim surcharge imposed.
hellorayo.co.uk
Verified against source
September 2025 1 case
Robert Edmunds
4 Sep 2025
Breach of a Non-Molestation Order and Theft *
Sentence
12 weeks imprisonment suspended for 12 months, 10 Rehabilitation Activity Requirement Days, 200 hours unpaid work, £85 costs, £154 victim surcharge

Robert Edmunds attended the home he previously shared with his ex-partner under the guise of collecting belongings following the breakdown of their relationship. He stole all of the victim's underwear and breached a non-molestation order. He pleaded guilty at Great Yarmouth Magistrates Court and received a suspended prison sentence, unpaid work, rehabilitation activity days, costs and a victim surcharge.

Pleaded guilty to breaching a non-molestation order and theft. Also made subject of a 12-month restraining order preventing him from contacting the victim.
exposedabusers.co.uk
Verified against source
Date Not Specified 5 cases
Silvana Marques
Date not specified
Food hygiene offences *
Sentence
Ordered to pay a fine, victim surcharge and costs totalling £1896

During an unannounced inspection in January, Environmental Health officers found a widespread mouse infestation in the kitchen and bar area of To No Trabalho restaurant in Regent Street, Great Yarmouth. Mice droppings were on shelves with cutlery, bar counter, food storage and bowls. There was broken glass, rotting food, debris, unclean surfaces, black mould and grease buildup. An ice machine had yellow slime. A Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Notice closed the restaurant for 12 days until issues were resolved. A follow-up inspection showed improvement, and it received a Food Hygiene Rating of four, but the business has since ceased trading.

Pleaded guilty to six charges relating to food hygiene failures including unclean premises, mouse infestation and inadequate pest control. Owned and ran To No Trabalho restaurant.
abcfoodlaw.co.uk
Verified against source
Kelly Utting
Date not specified
Failing to ensure animal welfare *
Sentence
Banned from keeping all animals for 10 years; fined £1,100

Kelly Utting failed to ensure the welfare of a miniature dachshund, which was found in December 2023 in a barely conscious, hypothermic and emaciated state, with its ribs, spine and pelvic bones visible. The dog was rushed to a Suffolk vet by a relative but was beyond recovery and had to be euthanised. The court found the animal had endured prolonged pain and extreme weight loss over a long period due to neglect.

Found guilty in absence of failing to ensure the welfare of a miniature dachshund. Ordered to pay £1,081 costs and a £440 victim surcharge.
uknip.co.uk
Verified against source
Antony Clifton
Date not specified
Breaching gas safety regulations *
Sentence
46 weeks in custody

Antony Clifton carried out gas work at a home in Drayton, Norwich, in January 2022 while suspended from the Gas Safe Register and falsely claimed to be a member. An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found that he had left a gas escape on the inlet to a cooker he had fitted the day before, requiring emergency repair work. He admitted breaching gas safety regulations.

Admitted breaching gas safety regulations. He was a director of CS Appliance Repairs Ltd and had been served with a prohibition notice by the HSE following previous unsafe gas work. He was also ordered to pay £1,000 costs.
landlordzone.co.uk
Verified against source
Bruce Marques
Date not specified
Food hygiene offences *
Sentence
Ordered to pay a fine, victim surcharge and costs totalling £1896

During an unannounced inspection in January, Environmental Health officers found a widespread mouse infestation in the kitchen and bar area of To No Trabalho restaurant in Regent Street, Great Yarmouth. Mice droppings were on shelves with cutlery, bar counter, food storage and bowls. There was broken glass, rotting food, debris, unclean surfaces, black mould and grease buildup. An ice machine had yellow slime. A Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Notice closed the restaurant for 12 days until issues were resolved. A follow-up inspection showed improvement, and it received a Food Hygiene Rating of four, but the business has since ceased trading.

Pleaded guilty to six charges relating to food hygiene failures including unclean premises, mouse infestation and inadequate pest control. Owned and ran To No Trabalho restaurant.
abcfoodlaw.co.uk
Verified against source
Daniel Kilty
Date not specified
Failing to ensure animal welfare *
Sentence
Banned from keeping all animals for 10 years; fined £1,100

Daniel Kilty failed to ensure the welfare of a miniature dachshund, which was found in December 2023 in a barely conscious, hypothermic and emaciated state, with its ribs, spine and pelvic bones visible. The dog was rushed to a Suffolk vet by a relative but was beyond recovery and had to be euthanised. The court found the animal had endured prolonged pain and extreme weight loss over a long period due to neglect.

Found guilty in absence of failing to ensure the welfare of a miniature dachshund. Ordered to pay £1,081 costs and a £440 victim surcharge.
uknip.co.uk
Verified against source

Disclaimer: The information on this page is compiled from publicly available court records and published media reports. It is provided strictly for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as a definitive record of any individual's criminal history or legal status.

Offence names marked with an asterisk (*) reflect descriptions used in media reporting and may not correspond to the formal legal charge or indictment. Sentencing details are as reported and may be subject to subsequent appeal, variation, or correction by the courts.

All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The presence of a name on this page does not imply guilt, and some listed individuals may have had convictions overturned, sentences reduced, or charges withdrawn after the date of publication.

Listings are subject to an ongoing review policy. Entries are delisted once the conviction is likely to be spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, and older entries are removed in any event after a maximum listing period. This information must not be used to make decisions about a person's employment, housing, credit, insurance, or any similar matter. It is not a substitute for an official criminal record check (DBS).

We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any court, government body, or law enforcement agency. While we endeavour to ensure the accuracy of all information, we accept no liability for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this data. If you believe any entry is inaccurate, outdated, or should be removed, please submit a removal request using the icon on the relevant entry or contact us directly.

No sentences found matching your search.

Court Image
84 N Quay, Great Yarmouth NR30 1PW, Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom
+441603679500
Wheelchair accessible entrance
Monday - Friday: 09:00 - 16:30

About Great Yarmouth Magistrates' Court

Great Yarmouth Magistrates' Court, located in Great Yarmouth, is a Magistrates' Court that deals with summary offences, some either-way offences, and preliminary hearings for more serious cases. With 7 sentencing records in our database, it serves the Great Yarmouth area and surrounding communities. Magistrates' Courts handle the majority of criminal cases in England and Wales, with cases heard by a bench of magistrates or a district judge.

The court can be found at 84 N Quay, Great Yarmouth NR30 1PW.

Accessibility provisions at this court include wheelchair accessible entrance.

For enquiries about cases heard at this court, you can contact the court by telephone on +441603679500.

The sentencing information on this page is compiled from published media reports and other publicly available sources, with automated and editorial checks applied before publication. If you believe any information is inaccurate, out of date, or should be removed, you can submit a removal request directly from the relevant listing above and it will be reviewed by a person.

Nearby Courts

Norwich Crown Court

Norwich Crown Court

Crown Court

Norwich

28.6 km away

Norwich Magistrates Court

Norwich Magistrates Court

Magistrates Court

Norwich

28.7 km away

Ipswich Magistrates Court

Ipswich Magistrates Court

Magistrates Court

Ipswich

73.2 km away

Ipswich Crown Court

Ipswich Crown Court

Crown Court

Ipswich

73.7 km away

Kings Lynn Magistrates Court

Kings Lynn Magistrates Court

Magistrates Court

King's Lynn

91.0 km away

Colchester Magistrates Court

Colchester Magistrates Court

Magistrates Court

Colchester

98.3 km away

Source and details

Please confirm you are not a bot to see where this record came from.

Request Removal

Requesting removal of listing for:

Every request is reviewed by a person. Requests relating to reporting restrictions, named victims or witnesses, or mistaken identity are treated as urgent.